Showing posts with label same sex marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label same sex marriage. Show all posts

Sunday, April 7, 2013

GAZETTE COLUMN: EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW – UNLESS YOU’RE GAY by John P. Flannery

Our Governor is not the worst homophobe in America but he is a contender.
Our Commonwealth is not the worst in its intolerance of gays but it’s got nothing to be proud of either.

In Loudoun County, we have a Board of Supervisors indifferent to the fact that one of its members, Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio, is a gay bashing demagogue.

I wrote each member of the Board of Supervisors to ask them to disavow this bigotry.  Our Board has no shame in its silence. As that old 60s tune went, “Hello Darkness my old friend.”  Janet Clarke wrote she felt no obligation to respond at all.  And she didn’t.  By their silence, may we know them.
Virginia has had a discouraging history when it comes to individual rights and liberties.

Virginia had to be told by the Supreme Court in 1967 that a ban on mixed-race marriages was unconstitutional as it violated “one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”

No doubt Virginia will have to be told its constitutional amendment against same sex marriage is unconstitutional as our General Assembly has presently decreed - VIRGINIA IS NOT FOR GAY LOVERS.

A Roman Senator once said that the fates lead you to your destiny, or they drag you to it.  Our Commonwealth has had to dragged before to its destiny and forced to end slavery, to grant women suffrage, to end segregation, to stop its massive resistance to integration.  Not too many years ago, our General Assembly defeated the equal rights amendment for women.

The Commonwealth is like a child that must be forced to do what’s right because it won’t do what’s right on its own.  It’s hard to support the Commonwealth’s insistence on its State’s rights when that means violating individual rights for its citizens.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy said that “the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
The test is whether Justice Kennedy will follow his own teaching and provide the swing vote to affirm same sex marriage as a right.

If not, then what Kennedy said, is an example of “people talking without speaking,” afraid to disturb the “sound of silence” that embraces such bigotry.

I am reminded of that popular Simon and Garfunkel song from the sixties, the “Sounds of Silence,” because it reminds us how the more we think we’ve advanced in tolerance, the more we must confess that we’ve advanced hardly at all.

So many who discriminate against gays hide behind some religious text or other that finds no support in anything that Jesus ever said.  Apparently we are all made in the image of God – unless, by the twisted view of some Christians, your image is gay. 

Nor is there much validity to the notion marriage is only to procreate, especially given our nation’s over-populating copulation with so many children born orphans and unwanted who can’t find adopting families.

When the mind of man scours the Old Testament to find support in Leviticus for a biblical sound bite to justify discrimination, they defy the teachings of Jesus to love one another. 

Ask yourself if Leviticus is really where we should be getting guidance anyhow?  Leviticus insists women are unclean and sinful after child birth (Leviticus 15:19-30), that a man who has sex with a slave woman won’t be punished, but the slave will be (Leviticus 19:20-22), and priests may only marry virgins (Leviticus 21:13-14).  Perhaps the Old South found comfort in Leviticus (Leviticus 25:44), stating “you may buy male and female slaves” but only from the surrounding “heathen” nations, a passage obscured in some translations, and,  of course, you may keep the children of these slaves as well (Leviticus 24: 45).  Some casuists say their slavery (in the time of Leviticus) was not like our slavery.  Oh really?

But I digress.

Our government is not the Holy Roman Catholic Church, nor any other Theistic entity, by which we are constrained to measure the rights of an individual in our constitutional society.

It is time to end this foul form of discrimination against gays so easily embraced by our political leaders and by our friends and neighbors.

Our individual dignity is insulted and abused by this persistent permeating prejudice visited on others.  Our silence is acquiescence and does “like a cancer grow.”

Some travel on missions around the globe to inform other nations of the values of democracy and others travel to teach the word of God.  We have plenty of soul work to do here in America to dismantle the neon God we’ve built that allows many to say this discrimination against gays is what God wants.  We have plenty of work to perfect our union, and to find our voice again, rather than remaining silent in the face of such bigotry.

Thursday, August 9, 2012

GAZETTE COLUMN: SICK CHICK by John P. Flannery


In an obese society, you would think folk would stay away from heart attack centers like fast food Chick-Fil-A for that reason alone, that it’s not healthy, but now we have another reason, its owner’s avowed intolerance of gays and same sex marriage.
About fast food, consider that a chargrilled chicken club, a dab of mayo, waffle potato fries, sweetened iced tea, and a small chocolate milkshake at Chick-Fil-A is worth a whopping 1,430 calories with 60 grams of fat, and 111 grams of sugar.  (Calculate your own meal - http://www.chick-fil-a.com/Food/Meal )  Ouch!  Let out your pants if you’re eating here regularly.  Feel your heart grow sluggish lubadub at the last shake sip.  You might pause, however, to worry about the onset of diabetes.  Of course, this is our national epidemic – eating badly.  Nearby West Virginia has the nation’s highest obesity rate at 33%, and the lowest state is in the low 20s; Virginia is “sandwiched” in the mid-distance between the best and the worst.  If this is not discouraging, and you still want to pig out, you can find on-line a Chick-Fil-A near you (http://www.chick-fil-a.com/Locations/Locator).  Keep in mind, however, that the USDA calorie counter, based on age, height, weight, and activity, teaches us that you really shouldn’t eat very much more on any day you’ve devoured a “snack” like this. http://www.newcaloriecounter.com/articles/goverment/usda/usda_national_nutrient_database_for_standard_reference.html . 
Of course, choosing to eat badly yourself is different than attacking and advocating intolerance against others. 
Dan Cathy, the owner of Chick-Fil-A, said he supported the “biblical definition of a family” and said that Americans have a “prideful, arrogant attitude” about same sex marriage that risks “inviting God’s judgment on our nation.”  He also bragged about the men in his family for “still being on their first wives.”
Cathy’s attack on gay marriage, on the patriotism of those who support same sex marriage, and on the alleged harm to the nation he attributed to those who supported same sex marriage was both hateful and intolerant speech.
This has nevertheless prompted folk to defend Mr. Cathy’s First Amendment right to be intolerant against gays and gay marriage. 
It’s no surprise that Sarah Palin is intolerant about gays and same sex marriage when she’s not killing wildlife and field dressing her kill.  It is marvelously ironic, however, that erstwhile Presidential Candidate and Fox contributor, Mike Huckabee, himself a diabetic, having once bragged he lost 100 pounds dieting, has since suffered a relapse regaining his fuller figure, and invited America to join him by eating the fast food that he once railed against, at Chick-Fil-A, to show “appreciation” for the owner’s hateful intolerance.  It turns out that Huckabee has been eating the chain’s chicken (not so secretly) for 35 years and knew the company’s founder.
The fast food owner, Dan Cathy, might have given a second thought when making his remarks given that gays in same sex marriages likely work for him, and eat his food – at least they did before his recent charge they were ruining the nation.  You have to wonder now if he refuses franchisees who are in same sex marriages, and what his policy is about his employees’ sexual preferences. 
One of Cathy’s employees in Tucson, Arizona was asked while being videotaped about the “hateful corporation” she worked for.  She said, she was “staying neutral on this subject … my personal beliefs don’t belong in the workplace.”  Too bad Owner Cathy and his Dad’s best customer and guardian angel, Huckabee, didn’t see it the same way.  
Mr. Cathy might learn something from Bill Marriott who also believes in same sex marriages as a Mormon but does not impose his belief on his employees who work in 3,700 Marriot properties.  In a recent Bloomberg interview, Mr. Marriott reportedly said, “We have to take care of our people, regardless of their sexual orientation or anything else.”  Mr. Marriott noted how, by way of analogy, “Our Church is very much opposed to alcohol and we’re probably one of the biggest sales engines of liquor in the United States.  I don’t drink.  We serve a lot of liquor.”  More to the point, when his church opposed the same sex marriage initiative in California, he publicly stated Marriott’s commitment to gay rights through domestic partners benefits and services aimed at gay couples.
Dan Cathy would have done well to say his personal biases have no business in the workplace.  That he hasn’t is a good enough reason to exercise your First Amendment right to say that he’s dead wrong, and to practice a consumer’s right to get your fast food elsewhere.