Showing posts with label Election profile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election profile. Show all posts

Thursday, November 3, 2011

GAZETTE COLUMN: THE IDES OF NOVEMBER by John P. Flannery


There’s a recent movie, “the Ides of March,” about how politicians manipulate us for their personal advantage.  We are reminded by this cinematic exercise that Brutus and Cassius have modern day equivalents who wave American flags while they assassinate good government.  If only there were no such sociopathic political compulsives!
But the intense factional rivalry that has become our national political culture means campaigners are relentlessly misdirecting us to some sensational irrelevancy, rather than having the public dialogue we need for good governance.
Too many hollow men and women shift their policies from one loss-leading polled belief to another.
If we have a candidate in Loudoun County who hopes to mimic such political manipulation, it will be one who wants residential development but who won’t admit it publicly.
We live in a County that can hardly afford the public services required by the residential development in place and in the pipe-line (40,000 units).  We have discomforting traffic congestion from east to west and back again.  We struggle to teach children new to our community at the rate of three newly built schools every year.  Our housing values decline or remain stagnant.
The measure of who is worth our vote in the electoral pairings is the candidate most likely to oppose residential development.
I’m suspicious of first time candidates who’ve never done anything in the community that I can verify.
Each of us should look therefore at what each candidate has done and judge whether they were found worthy or wanting by our friends and neighbors; that’s how I reject outright some folk and support others.
I look askance at any candidate who has accepted developer contributions – particularly from non-resident developers.
I don’t buy the “hard love” of those candidates who tell me not to expect anything from the government.  Really?  Then why are you running if that’s your point of view?  I expect and demand that government restrain those no-good outliers among us, who serve their selfish interests alone, and are entirely unconcerned whether they plunder and despoil our land, the air we breathe or the water we drink.  They won’t go on the record for equal rights for all our citizens.  They won’t lift a finger to lighten the load of those citizens suffering hard times. 
My Irish nature almost reflexively resists any law or rule that restrains freedom but my life experience and intelligence teach that not all men and women are angels for, as Madison observed in Federalist No. 51 in 1788, if we were angels, we would not need government at all. 
It’s also indisputable that we need law enforcement, fire and rescue, prosecutors, public defenders, social services, teachers, road crews, court personnel, elected officials, an array of support staff and more to assure us of peace, safety, and an historic legacy worthy of our children.
We also need men and women in government who understand business but not those that fail to appreciate that the bottom line in business is not the same measure we apply in the same way to the public services that citizens expect.
While the national debate is not entirely irrelevant, it has little to do with the public policy decisions that concern us when electing a local district supervisor, school board member, state delegate, state senator, sheriff or commonwealth attorney?
If we have to squint and take the measure of any candidate, especially for supervisor, the overriding question is can we trust this person to resist more residential development or will he or she fold like a house of cards before those hidden selfish interests, leaving us to brace ourselves for the end of what’s rural and a regretful shift to ever increasing density in what has been suburban. 
I think if we choose carefully, we won’t have any regrets on the Ides of November.

Thursday, October 27, 2011

GAZETTE COLUMN: JIM BURTON FOR BLUE RIDGE SUPERVISOR by John P. Flannery

Jim Burton is running for re-election to the Board of Supervisors to represent the Blue Ridge District.
We should re-elect him because we need a proven and experienced hand to deal with the budget, the first piece of business before the Board next January 2012; and we can’t afford to have someone learning “on the job” – not in these difficult economic times.
Jim has been the Blue Ridge Supervisor, repeatedly elected since 1995 as an Independent, first in the Mercer District before it became the Blue Ridge District.
Jim is well regarded for how he combines thoughtful reflection with constructive action in the County’s best interest.  With his background, that’s no surprise.
Jim is from Normal, Illinois, from a Railroad family, having by-passed a pro baseball career, to join the first class at the Air Force Academy.
Jim’s character was cast during his service with the legendary John Boyd, a defense department reformer and one of the greatest fighter pilots that ever lived.
Jim met Boyd after Jim had graduated from the Air Force Academy, after Jim had flown tankers for the Strategic Air Command (SAC),  and after Jim had attended the Squadron Officers School, the Air Command and Staff College, and the Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
Boyd’s most poignant advice to Jim was to do “what was right for the situation.”
Jim lived that advice when, as a specialist in weapons acquisition and testing, he charged the Defense Department’s “business of buying weapons” was “dirty and corrupt” at the expense of the soldier’s safety, focusing on the untested $14 Billion Bradley Fighting Vehicle’s poor design.  Jim successfully fought to make the vehicle safe and combat ready, wrote an award-winning book exposing the scandal, and was portrayed in a movie about the whole incident (played by the leading man from the ‘Princess Bride’ (yes, really!)).
After Jim retired from the military to Aldie, there was a large flap over the sprawl development involving 50 homes west of Aldie.  Jim was concerned, “change [was] coming that [was] dramatic … at a pace that we [were] not able to adjust to,” and there’d be “dislocations.”  Jim believes in “smart development,” that is, “at a rate that the community can adjust to and … for which the community can provide the necessary amenities and facilities.”
Jim appeared at many public meetings to argue this point until a Sheriff’s Deputy served him with a subpoena issued by a developer seeking Jim’s personal records, all because Jim spoke against his development.
While the subpoena was quashed, Jim was angry that this had happened at all, prompting him to run for the first time to the Board of Supervisors.
As a kind of wake-up call, Jim underscored the fact, that presently “we have 41,000 un-built residential units in the pipeline.”   
Jim says that, despite the economic challenges, and the limitations imposed by Richmond on what the Board can do legally, we have still managed to have lower taxes than in 2009, continue to preserve the County’s triple A rating and we can hold to a sound course, if we budget carefully, forego certain expenses in the short term, prevent changes to the comprehensive plan, and resist those who would open the transition area for development.
In conclusion, we need to have Jim re-elected to the Board of Supervisors for all that he’s done and what else he can do to make a difference for the better.
# # #

Thursday, September 8, 2011

SP PROFILE: JIM BURTON - IND CANDIDATE FOR BLUE RIDGE SUPERVISOR. by John P. Flannery


Jim & Lina Burton – reading iPad & Kindle respectively
______________________
“Have you read the ‘Age of Entanglement,’ John,” Jim Burton asked.
“Why no,” I said.
“You must,” Jim said.
The book, “entanglement,” is the record of an historic dialogue, mostly in the roaring ‘20s, among the scientific greats including Einstein, Heisenberg, Rutherford, Planck, Bohr, Ehrenfest, Pauli, Mach, Sommerfeld, Born, and Lorentz, who puzzled over how there could exist an instantaneous “telepathic” connection between particles at a distance, that remained “entangled,” even though separated.
In one of our previous conversations, Jim mentioned I should read a book about religion and the founding fathers.  “Did you read it?” Jim asked.  “Yes, I did.”
Jim is like a monk-warrior, always in thoughtful meditation, and yet fully engaged in the field of action.
He has been a Supervisor, repeatedly elected since 1995 as an Independent, first in the Mercer District before it became the Blue Ridge District; Jim’s challenger in this Fall’s election for the Blue Ridge District is Janet Clarke, the Republican Nominee.
Asked how he decides public policy, he says, “I try to find an answer that makes my conscience feel right.”
This boy from Normal, Illinois, from a Railroad family, turned down the chance to be a pro baseball player to join the first class at the Air Force Academy, but it wasn’t until his 30s at the Pentagon that he found the mentor that posed the question that forged his character.
John Boyd, a defense department reformer, one of the greatest fighter pilots that ever lived, insisted that Jim read hundreds of books.  Boyd may have been the most significant military theorist since Sun Tzu.  Among Burton’s required reading, of course, were various editions of Tzu’s “The Art of War.”  Also several books by the physicist Heisenberg.  Boyd wrote a manual of air to air fighting tactics that influenced every air force in the world, he proposed drastically altered air craft designs, and taught Marine Corps fighters how to war as well.
Jim Burton, a graduate of the first class at the Air Force Academy in 1959, who flew tankers for the Strategic Air Command (SAC),  and attended all three military schools after the Academy – the Squadron Officers School, the Air Command and Staff College, and the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, first thought Boyd was “crazy.”  He saw Boyd in his office mimicking jet aerial combat maneuvers with his hands.  Jim later found Boyd “fascinating” and then learned that Boyd was “crazy like a fox.”
“Boyd used to tell me,” said Jim, “you’ll come to a fork in the road and you’ll have to make a choice.  Down one path you behave a certain way and you will be promoted and receive the riches of rank.  You go down the other path and you will be self-rewarded for having done what was right for the situation no matter what the system says.  But, if you ever challenge the system, it will come back at you -- big time.”
Jim followed his conscience, chose right over rank, and found himself in a war of reform with the Army and the Air Force.  Air Force Colonel Burton was a specialist in weapons acquisition and testing, and he charged that the department’s “business of buying weapons” was “dirty and corrupt from top to bottom,” and that the government genuflected to defense contractors at the expense of soldier safety.  His target was the untested Bradley Fighting Vehicle’s poor design, that cost the taxpayers a whopping $14 Billion, but was vulnerable to anti-armor weapons.  Jim wanted to correct the design and expose the so-called “fighting” vehicle to a live fire test to assure it was battle ready.  In the end, Jim prevailed, making the vehicle safer for service men and women in the Gulf War.  But he was attacked because he did what was right – just as Boyd said. 
Jim didn’t let it die; he wrote an expose, titled, “The Pentagon Wars: Reformers Challenged the Old Guard” and won 1st prize in the Washington Monthly’s Political Book Award in 1993.  In the HBO Movie that followed, Cary Elwes, of “Princess Bride” fame played Jim; can’t complain about that; and you can get a tease of the feature on YouTube -  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E8DQSHkhGE .
Jim may have thought he put public service behind him when he left the Pentagon to retire to the historic Mercer house in the village of Aldie.
But it was not meant to be.  Soon after he “settled” in, there was a large flap over development proposed for 50 homes west of the village; it was, by all accounts, sprawl development, and not very “smart growth.”  Jim said he was concerned then as now with “change coming that is dramatic … at a pace that we are not able to adjust to, and we can therefore expect dislocations to occur.” 
Jim said, “this is what Alvin Toffler meant in his book, ‘Future Shock’ – ‘too much change in too short a period of time.”  Toffler worried about such shock causing suffering from “shattering stress and disorientation.” 
“Slow growth,” Jim said, “means at a rate that the community can adjust to and, as or more importantly, provide the necessary amenities and facilities.”
“In all my community activity, before and since I was on the Board,” Jim said, “that’s been my concern.”
“When we met with that Aldie developer at a Middleburg Restaurant,” Jim said, he “clenched his first” and came on “like a prize fighter,” and announced, “I’m going to fight you.” 
That hardly intimidated Jim or the other Aldie residents who believed this development was wrong, and ultimately, Jim said, “after the dust settled, he pulled out.”
Soon, Jim appeared at many public meetings including the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors regarding questionable development projects proposed elsewhere in Loudoun County, particularly around the villages of Round Hill, that made no accommodation for the services the development required. 
“I had become a citizen activist,” Jim said. 
That wasn’t enough, in Jim’s mind, when a Sheriff’s Deputy served a subpoena seeking all of Jim’s personal records, because the developer sought to prove that Jim conspired with adjoining landowners who Jim didn’t know, supposedly to stop the development. 
“That got me,” Jim said, “sitting in that court room, waiting for the court to quash that subpoena, that made me angry, that my fate was in their hands,” and, “that got me thinking to get more involved in the development process here in Loudoun County.”
Instead of appearing before the Board, Jim decided to run for the Board of Supervisors and was elected from the Mercer District, as an Independent. 
Since he was first elected, Jim has resisted the residential development that the County can hardly afford, “unbridled growth” Jim calls it.
“The County has added 143,000 new residents since 2000,” Jim said, “and more than tripled its student population in the last 17 years.”
“We may have to build 49 more schools by 2026,” Jim said, “at the rate of 3 or more a year.”
More than that, Jim said, “we have 41,000 unbuilt residential units in the pipeline.”
Jim said we have to help the citizens, save where we can, and encourage slow growth. 
In order to “guide the County through the maze in these uncertain economic times,” Jim says, we had lower taxes than in 2009, and we must maintain “our sound financial condition including our triple A rating, and, finally, we must prevent changes to the comprehensive plan that propose to open any more areas of the County to increased density, and resist the building pressure to open the transition area for development, that is, the area intended to be a transition from the urban east to the rural west.”
Jim then said, “He had to go.”  Lina, his wife said he had to go.  Jim delayed for a bit, “After I lost my first wife, Nancy Lee, to cancer, I was lost myself,” Jim said, “but I met Lina on a committee and she’s become my partner, side kick and campaign manager.  All I can say is that I’ve been lucky to know two great women in my life.”
“One last question before you go, Jim, why are you an Independent?”
 “I prefer to do my own thinking,” said Jim, “and take responsibility for my own thinking.”