Showing posts with label Gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gingrich. Show all posts

Friday, January 27, 2012

GAZETTE COLUMN: BEGIN THE WORLD OVER AGAIN – MARTIN LUTHER KING’S DREAM by John P. Flannery

It was Tom Paine who wrote that we as a people and a new nation had the capacity “to begin the world over again.”
Martin Luther King set out to make the world over again and he made a good start before he was shot dead.
King said, “Let us be those creative dissenters who will call upon our beloved nation to a higher destiny, to a new plateau of compassion, to a more noble expression of humaneness.”
That’s what we celebrated when we marched last week from the court house to the school house – our opportunity to begin the world over again.
Of course, we talked about the cold and of the diverse community of warmly bundled marchers with colorful scarves and trophies from past political marches carrying steaming hot coffee cups; then, somewhat self-consciously, we realized the only inconvenience we faced in our march was the wind and weather.
Just think about the march in Selma, Alabama and how it succeeded in winning voting rights legislation in 1965 because, as King described it, a “stubborn sheriff” acted so wrongly in handling the protest that he “stumbled against the future.”
Martin Luther King was a man immersed and saturated in the Christian spirit, shaped by the Bible, focused on what was just, on equality, and he chose as his guide for activism the non-violence of Jesus and of Gandhi.
After Selma, King said that, “Occasionally in life one develops a conviction so precious and meaningful that he will stand on it till the end.  That is what I have found in nonviolence.”
Anticipating his own death, King said in the Ebenezer Church in Atlanta, that he identified with those who were poor and hungry and, “[i]f it means dying for them, I’m going that way, because I heard a voice say, ‘Do something for others.’”
The challenge for our nation, in his mind, was human rights; it remains our challenge today.
In this presidential election year, decades later, we have a need and the opportunity to concern ourselves with the collective misfortune of our friends and neighbors.
Former Speaker Newt Gingrich declared after his electoral presidential primary victory in South Carolina that the reason for his win was “[t]he American people feel that they have elites who have been trying for a half century to force us to quit being American and become some kind of other system.”
Gingrich celebrates individual freedom from any government program.  Gingrich pretty plainly has said that he will cut out food stamps (makes fun of the President for feeding the hungry) and housing for the poor, unemployment insurance for the jobless, training programs for those who want to join the work force, education grants, and he would curtail or eliminate Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.  These are among the last 50 years of government legislation and programs that Gingrich disapproves. 
Gingrich’s win in South Carolina confirms, what King said years ago, that “[o]verwhelmingly America is still struggling with irresolution and contradictions.”
Gingrich does not discuss much the elite that he does celebrate, the filthy rich who sustain both Romney and Gingrich, two heads of the same beast, who especially resist any public system that dares regulate their favored elite, even though, to borrow from King again, the current regulatory “[l]egislation … is evaded, substantially nullified and unenforced [making the effort in recent days] … a mockery of law.”
The assistant director of the office of economic opportunity, Hyman Bookbinder, back in 1966, said that “the poor can stop being poor if the rich are willing to become even richer at a slower rate.”  Now the same can be said about what’s happening to the middle class.  But Gingrich and his kind would accelerate their profits – at our expense.
King worked “to begin the world over again.”  In the midst of our almost unprecedented domestic crisis and our costly foreign entanglements, this presidential election is an excellent time to resolve to continue King’s work and to climb that “plateau of compassion, to a more noble expression of humaneness.”  Now that’s a worthy challenge for any political campaign!

Saturday, December 10, 2011

GAZETTE COLUMN: WE CAN’T REFUSE TO HELP CHILDREN! by John P. Flannery

Food Stamp Benefit Card
We can’t refuse to help children.
There are parents who resent our First Lady’s suggestion that our children should eat good food and exercise -- if they can.  My Mom told me to eat well and exercise.  My teacher and coach, John Lyttle, at Fordham Prep taught us how to eat well and exercise.  When I was young, President Jack Kennedy inspired the nation to be fit and vigorous -- though he had severe disabilities.  We should welcome, not resist, a First Lady who re-visits these worthy values of good nutrition and exercise and invites our nation to embrace them anew.
Consider that we have 21 million children in school, receiving federally subsidized lunches.  At lunch, they consume 40% of all the calories they eat in a day.  Fully a third of all these children are overweight or obese. 
Congress looked the other way recently, favoring its monied contributors over our children, when it rejected the USDA’s proposed nutritional guidelines and treated pizza with tomato sauce as a vegetable, and approved a diet of French fries, starchy vegetables, and salt for our children.  Congress refused to help our children – so now we must do what Congress failed to do.
We have many other children who are not in danger of being overweight.  They are in danger, however, of going hungry.  We have gone from 18 million children eating lunches in 2006 to 21 million students today.  Layoffs have meant more families qualify for the free lunch program.  A family with an income that is 130 percent of the poverty level, $29,055 for a family of four, can receive free school meals.  A family with an income of $41,348 can receive a lunch for a 40 cent charge. 
Nor does this problem end with the school day.  More families now qualify for the USDA food stamp program to feed their children and to feed themselves after school.  Not that they get stamps any more.  It’s more like a debit card.  The USDA grants money to poor households to buy food and – since the recession – the ratio of poor to the rest of the population went from 130 per thousand in 2007 to 153 per thousand in 2010, an increase of 18 %.
Only a few days ago, former Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican presidential contender, attacked the food stamp program, criticizing President Obama for feeding the hungry so well, wrongly charging “You don’t get food stamps, you get a credit card and the credit card can be used for anything.  We’ve had people take their food-stamp money and use it to go to Hawaii.”
Gingrich scapegoats the poor with lies to win political support from the unwary and the well fed to advance his presidential primary bid.  We should know three things.  First, there is no “credit” card; there is instead an electronic benefits card – EBT card – and it creates an audit trail of expenditures, like your debit card, and bars the card holder from buying any items that are disallowed.  Second, you can’t buy restaurant meals, beer, wine or liquor, nor vitamins, food that you’d eat at the store, nor hot food, and most certainly not any plane tickets to Hawaii or any place else.  Third, Gingrich told another whopper when he said that “they give food stamps now to millionaires.” Nonsense.  You can’t get food stamps if you earn more than 130 percent of the poverty line.
Speaker Gingrich attacks the poor, as he proclaims in the most reverential tones, his Christian faith.  Perhaps Gingrich follows a different testament than other Christians for Jesus “cursed into everlasting fire” those who gave no meat nor drink when he “hungered.”  Matthew 25:41-42.  Of course, Jesus was not talking about his hunger but of his brothers and sisters.  Jesus explained, “When you refused to help the least of these my brothers, you were refusing to help me.”  Matthew 25:46.  Plainly, Speaker Gingrich wants only to help himself; his soul is as empty of charity as is a vacuum of air.
Unlike Congress and Gingrich, we must not refuse to help our children who are hungry.  Nor refuse to help children to eat better.  If we are truly a family, then we must act like one – and help each other.