Friday, January 28, 2011

GAZETTE COLUMN: PEOPLE GO POLAR ON THE POTOMAC - J. Flannery


Some people jump into icy cold water for no good reason. 
By contrast, on January 22, 2011, 200 men and women, from 7 to 74 years of age, with an air temperature of 17 degrees, took a frigid polar bear plunge into the Potomac at Maryland’s National Harbor, downstream from the U.S. Congress, demanding that our political leaders save real polar bears from extinction – as well as their human kissin’ cousins.
The demand is that Congress adopt policies to decrease carbon emissions from 388 parts per million of carbon dioxide to 350 parts, a safe level (see http://www.350.org/ )
My wife Holly planned to swim while I held hot drinks, foot warmers, towels, a thick terry cloth robe, my camera and yellow sheets for notes.  You can see why I couldn’t make the plunge myself.
Some disbelievers might wonder if cold weather doesn’t contradict the science of global warming.  But extreme weather conditions are averaged with other climate phenomenon.  They don’t change the fact that the average temperature worldwide has gone up 1.4 degrees since 1880, and that we had our hottest temperatures in 400 years in the last several decades.  The average temperature in Alaska, Western Canada and Eastern Russia have increased almost twice as fast as the global average.  We’ve seen Antarctica melting.  Islands and shore lines are receding.  Arctic ice is disappearing rapidly, and an ice free summer there is now foreseeable.  Polar bears are at risk, as they lose their sea ice habitat, the ice platforms they hunt from and that protect them from drowning.  They are losing more young, starving, and every fifth bear is dying.
Hundreds milled in clusters with polar bear caps and hot coffee in hand, the last folk song finished, the wind blowing, ice rimming the Potomac, as Mike Tidwell, the founder of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network (www.chesapeakeclimate.org), reassured the polar bear plungers in waiting that some swimmer had been doing this for years, proving you “can survive the plunge,” and remind congress that “the science isn’t lying.” 
Last year, the National Research Council released, “Advancing the Science of Climate Change,” confirming once again that global warming is caused by what we humans do.
Maryland Congresswoman Donna Edwards said she was “warming up” to the plunge and invited citizens to “lean on us” in Congress to get something done; she was backed up by San Francisco 49ers inside linebacker, NaVorro Bowman.
As the polar plungers dropped off their clothes in nearby tents and emerged unprotected in swimsuits in the winds along the icy banks, a cheer went up and they raced as one splashing into the icy waters.
Among those in trunks was Franciscan Father Jacek Orzeshowski who told us that he made the plunge because combating global warming was a “moral and spiritual challenge” and “faith communities are embracing this movement,” so we can “defend the powerless,” avoid extinction, and save the “awesome diversity of life;” he prayed that all who plunged may enjoy the “fire of grace in our bellies.”  May it be the same for those who fight global warming everywhere!

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

REPUBLICAN HOUSE LEADER WANTS TO END TAXPAYER FINANCING OF PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS

The Supreme Court hasn't done enough to make our laws subject to high dollar politcal contributions.  Funny it was only a year ago when one Supreme Court Justice shook his head when President Obama criticized the obscene fund-raising allowed by the Supreme Court.

Now Republican House Leader Eric Cantor wants to eliminate any taxpayer financing for presidential elections. 

After tonight's state of the union, Cantor is starting the presidential campaign at 10 AM, Wednesday, on the house floor to consider:

H.R. 359 - To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating taxpayer financing of presidential election campaigns and party conventions (Modified Open Rule) (Sponsored by Rep. Tom Cole / Ways and Means Committee / House Administration Committee)

Cantor has announced that "the rule [for discussion on the floor] provides for one hour of general debate, not more than five hours of amendment debate, and makes in order only those amendments that have been preprinted in the Congressional Record."

Who ever said talk is cheap?

Friday, January 21, 2011

GAZETTE ED: POLITICAL SLEIGHT OF HAND by John Flannery


Political Sleight of hand works best when we’re slight of mind – when we don’t pay careful attention.
Only days ago, President Barack Obama encouraged our leaders to talk “with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds.”
Some have agreed to curb their rhetoric and others propose to sit with other partisans when the President addresses a joint session of Congress on January 25, 2011.
But what a Congress does can cause violence as destructive as a 9mm bullet.
A former federal employee, living in Loudoun, retired when he was 55, now 10 years ago.  He counts on his monthly retirement check.  Days ago the government told him that he was not getting a COLA (a cost of living adjustment), and his monthly payment has been reduced.  What does he do now?
The government told a woman on Social Security disability that they’ve been over paying her for years, she disputes it, but they are going to pay her less, and the new amount won’t cover her monthly rent.  She said days ago they’re forcing her onto the street.
Across the nation, state governments including Virginia are telling state employees that their retirement will be cut short and they have to pay or do without the benefits they were promised when they agreed to become public servants.  No stimulus for these working men and women.  We depress them instead.
Only last month, a congress of invertebrates told the wealthiest in the nation, their principal contributors, not to pay more in taxes (3% more), and so now the middle class are getting less and being asked to pay and suffer more.
Republican House Speaker John Boehner, a beneficiary of significant contributions from the insurance industry, with a gilt-edged health plan himself, has set out to repeal health care.  The Congressional Budget Office says the cost of repealing this bill will be $230 billion over the next ten years.  Boehner is concerned about reducing the deficit except when it’s inconvenient to his contributors.  If the Speaker succeeds and kills this cost-saving health reform, then millions of Americans won’t be insured, and if you get sick or lose your job, you may lose your coverage as well.  Pre-existing conditions won’t be covered, children will not be covered, and lifetime caps on insurance pay-outs will be restored.
As for Social Security, the trust fund has $2.9 Trillion.  It’s your money.  You pay into this fund every time you’re paid a wage or salary.  Did you know that our government has been borrowing from this trust fund to reduce the deficit?  Speaker Boehner thinks maybe you can wait from 65 until you are seventy to retire, reducing your lifetime benefits by 30 percent.  Republican Congressman Paul Ryan has drafted a program for Speaker Boehner to privatize Social Security and provide vouchers for Medicare. 
Civility is part of the answer but good conduct is the rest and cutting health care and social security doesn’t heal, it wounds, steals dignity, causes pain, and costs lives.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

SUNDAY TALKING HEADS - COMING UP SHORT

On the Sunday talk shows, they were talking about mental health, in my opinion, so that no one will think about the violence prone language and actions of our public officials that prompted the Fenster-like shooter in Tucson to wound and kill so many in an effort to get his principal political target, Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.

For one thing, this Congress is not going to do anything about mental health. 

We didn't do anything about it before the shooting in Tucson, nor the shootings before that one. 

It is ironic even to be talking about mental health reform, as Speaker John Boehner prepares to repeal the reform health bill this week. 

If the Speaker has his way, there will be fewer public tools to redress mental health challenges.

Don't get me wrong. 

This is a significant issue, and we handle it so bad in this nation's culture that even returning combat veterans fail to reveal the symptoms of PTSD or TBI, lest they be treated like pariah, even after they've risked their lives for this nation in Iraq or Afghanistan.

But we haven't finished discussing the predicate for considering mental health or even gun laws.

We must spend more time seriously discussing what our public officials did, and may continue to do, to prompt violence at home by their acerbic and vitriolic political discourse. 

Some have said it was "just exaggerated talk." 

That's just not true.

By way of example, we all remember those citizens last summer who shouted down congressmen and congresswomen in their districts, didn't allow them to talk, spoke with a great deal of abuse and disrespect. 

They were dehumanizing and denigrating our representatives so that we would lose respect for them. 

Consciously or unconsciously, they were attempting to create a psychological distance that allows for more than just spoken abuse to be suffered by our public officials.

No one can forget how some citizens spat upon members of Congress outside the Capitol. 

That was another advance in the wrong direction for a democracy and it was made possible by the abuse beforehand of members in their districts.

We have to consider more than how our leaders speak. 

We have to discuss what tactics are permissible at public meetings.

I didn't say legislate but, as a society, we have to re-visit what it means to lead and how one can best follow and express one's independent views.

Would that our nation would develop a code of conduct for public discourse that might minimize the risk to public officials and citizens.

Then maybe we shall heal, and not wound, as the President rightly instructed earlier this week.


Friday, January 14, 2011

Read Tribbett on giving power back to the people!

Those of you who think Richmond gets away with murder should read Ben Tribbett's post on giving power back to the people who have their own minds - http://notlarrysabato.typepad.com/doh/2011/01/state-repeal-amendment.html.  This might be the answer to the Dillon Rule that says it's all about Richmond, not us folk.  Anyhow give it a look. 

John Flannery

Boehner's Boner


Speaker Boehner's boner - passes on air lift from Prez to Tucson memorial, and then passes on WH State Dinner - a small man in a big job.